Re: IPv6 tests fail
Jaap Winius <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Dave Shield <[email protected]>: > On 30 June 2011 11:51, Jaap Winius <[email protected]> wrote: >> So far I've tried configuring /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf with, for example: >> >> agentAddress udp:6161,tcp6:161,udp6:1616 > > What are your access control settings? In /etc/hosts.allow I've got: snmpd: ALL Plus, I'm running xinetd, which has IPv6 support, but I'm not sure if that makes too much difference. I've also got "rouser noauth" in my snmpd.conf, although I'm not using snmp v3 at the moment. No com2sec or com2sec6 settings. Cheers, Jaap ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users