Re: can IFTABLE_REMOVE_MISSING_AFTER be changed ?
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKoMtGYPCx6W5QF98mrh-mkuddWNLhL2Q=VTNz5umRv0i2NAfQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On 5 September 2011 10:23, anand anand <[email protected]> wrote: > When trying a snmpwalk on ifXTable or ifTable after the removal, the data > for the removed interface still gets displayed till 300 seconds as defined > by IFTABLE_REMOVE_MISSING_AFTER in ifTable_data_access.h > IFTABLE_REMOVE_MISSING_AFTER is defined as per some standard or can it be > changed ? No - I don't believe this is fixed in stone anywhere. Five minutes was probably justfelt to be a convenient expiry time. If you need to tweak this to match your requirements, go right ahead. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users