Re: Regarding GetBulk
Pete Snmp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dave, This is regarding views and Master/Sub-Agent issues. 1)We use SNMP v2 for our box. Our client saying we can implement Views in v2, where as we know this is part of v3? Do we have views in V2? as far as I know Views exists in V3 only ! 2)Apart from that , I have a doubt regarding Master and Sub-Agent implementation ! There is a standard protocol called AgentX for communication between them. As far as the MIB implementation is concerned, I am pretty sure that we dont need to bother about this communication. But there is specific requirment from the client saying we need to have Master/Sub-Agent implementation experience. As far as I see this is one time configuration while setting up the agent and sub-agents on the box.Once done, we can write /implment MIBS without any concern to Monolithic or Master/Sub? Please let me know your comments. Thanks, Pete. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users