Re: snmpset gives different error reasons for v1 and v2c
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKoMtGbQgKmiiZdFybR6cQt_0-8HyHKJ=hWnRKi77wx2LOe+zA@mail.gmail.com> |
On 25 October 2011 13:17, ashok kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > While I am trying snmpset with -v1 and -v2c, I am getting different > reasons for errors..... > > Why am I getting noSuchName for -v1? Because that is the defined behaviour for SNMPv1. See RFC 1157, section 4.1.5, step (1) > I believe the error reason should be noAccess as > in the -v2 case. Except that 'noAccess' is not one of the SNMPv1 error reasons. >From the definition of PDU in the same RFC (section 5): PDU ::= SEQUENCE { request-id INTEGER, error-status -- sometimes ignored INTEGER { noError(0), tooBig(1), noSuchName(2), badValue(3), readOnly(4), genErr(5) }, Those are the only possible error responses. 'noAccess' is not one of them. This was one of the changes introduced with SNMPv2 Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users