Re: trap NAT 5.4.2.1

Dave Shield <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <CAKoMtGa7uvWmg2HBOhQS2yO9px23PuqPOTsc=D=2VdUF5HoS4g@mail.gmail.com>
    [ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
     any responses to the mailing list.  I don't have the time
     or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
     Also, if I'm busy with my main (paid) work, it may well be
     some time before I can respond.
     Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
     and offer advice in a more timely manner.  Thanks.   ]



On 6 December 2011 18:34, shay naveh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Another question regarding traps.
> Is it possible for 'snmptrapd' to receive a trap from, say in V1, and
> forward it as a V3 trap with an addition of a ContextName to the trap?

I don't believe so, no.
As far as I'm aware, forwarding of traps is currently only possible using
the same version of SNMP as the incoming notification.

Being able to specify a different version, along with controlling the other
administrative settings, would be a useful extension.  But as yet, I''m not
aware of anyone writing the necessary code.

Volunteers are always welcome.....

Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Systems Optimization Self Assessment
Improve efficiency and utilization of IT resources. Drive out cost and 
improve service delivery. Take 5 minutes to use this Systems Optimization 
Self Assessment. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51450054/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.