Re: mib2c.table_data.conf, cache timeout period does'nt seems to change.
Francois Bouchard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAZiaZeK6UVXe-tM4UE4SJ3XuvpQhn4JfxHk6mp=Hz4w-wHQvA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, Sorry about the mistake, I was asking for hints about the cache timeout values. It can't be modify when changing the xxx_TIMEOUT define statement ( ie.e stays at 60 seconds ) Any hints? Francois > But to answer your question - yes, I believe -S cache=1 > *is* different to "local cached copy" option They are binary equal files 2012/2/10 Dave Shield <[email protected]> > On 10 February 2012 15:02, Francois Bouchard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Is there defference in the code using mib2c -S cache=1 -c > > mib2c.table_data.conf myTable instead of > > mib2c -c mib2c.table_data.conf my myTable, option 1) ? > > Errr... that second form looks invalid. > mib2c only takes a single root OID. > > It would either be > > mib2c -c mib2c.table_data.conf my > or > mib2c -c mib2c.table_data.conf myTable > > Not both. > > I'm not quite sure why you're being asked questions > (unless it's because of the invalid invocation) - table_data > is a single, non-interactive configuration. > > But to answer your question - yes, I believe -S cache=1 > *is* different to "local cached copy" option > > Dave > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users