Re: snmpbulkget ?
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKoMtGb4q9-2+Ssw3Kn9suzxMuR1x+fewMt8k=go4JtvDXqJUw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 23 May 2012 17:18, czezz <[email protected]> wrote: > However what is the point of using snmpBULKGET instead of regular snmpGET ? If you are requesting a single value, then there is no benefit. The advantage of GetBulk (compared to simple GetNext) comes when you are retrieving a sequence of values - for example, when walking a table. Try comparing snmpbulkget .... ifAdminStatus vs snmpwalk .... ifAdminStatus If there are eight or nine rows in the table, then "snmpbulkget" will issue a single GetBulk request, and receive a single response containing all the relevant values. In contrast, "snmpwalk" would need to send nine or ten GetNext requests (with the same number of Response packets) to retrieve the same information. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users