Re: SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout interpreted incorrectly

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <OFC93ED812.B67FC7BF-ONC1257BA6.00297F9D-C1257BA6.0029DADE@rohde-schwarz.com>
that is what the definition says: measured in units of 0.01 seconds

in my case, I have set SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout, which is of 
type TimeInterval to 1000

1000 * 0.01 = 10 , so the timeout should be 10 seconds

but in fact, informs are re-sent every 1 second instead of 10 seconds


can you verify that behavior?

regards
Martin




Von:    zhuyj <[email protected]>
An:     [email protected], 
Kopie:  [email protected], zhuyj <[email protected]>
Datum:  12.07.2013 09:31
Betreff:        Re: SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout interpreted 
incorrectly



TimeInterval TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
              STATUS       current
              DESCRIPTION
                      "A period of time, measured in units of 0.01
                      seconds."
              ::= INTEGER (0..2147483647)

maybe 10 * 0.01 = 0.1 ?


On 07/12/2013 03:06 PM, [email protected] wrote:
any ideas on this issue? 

is TimeInterval defined as 0.1 seconds or seconds? 

is snmpTargetAddrTimeout implemented correctly? 

regards 
Martin Perzl 



Von:        [email protected] 
An:        [email protected], 
Datum:        04.07.2013 15:00 
Betreff:        SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout interpreted 
incorrectly 



I have set up an inform-sink with SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout 
set to 1000 (which is the default value in net-SNMP) 
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout is of type TimeInterval, which is 
defined as a period of time measured in 0.01 seconds (see 
http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/docs/mibs/snmpTargetMIB.html#TimeInterval 
for details) 

I am assuming, that informs will be re-sent (if not acknowledged) every 10 
seconds (1000*0.01 seconds = 10 seconds) 

But in fact, the retry interval, which I observed was 1 second (instead of 
the expected 10 seconds) 

I think this is a bug. Am I misunderstanding something? 


Regards 
Martin Perzl 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk


_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.