Re: hrSWRunPerfCPU - 5.4.3 vs 5.7.2

Shoot, sorry about the duplicate - I thought the first message didn't go
through.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Vincent Newell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I have a small LAN of four systems for which I would like to monitor
> specific processes' CPU and Memory utilization.  I am able to determine the
> PID and host on which each process is running so I would like to use SNMP
> to make the actual queries for resource utilization.  For Ubuntu 12.04 with
> net-snmp 5.4.3, I wrote some software to find all of the processes (using
> ROS), and dispatch SNMP queries and track performance using
> HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrSWRunPerfCPU.<pid> and
> HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrSWRunPerfMem.  Each data point combines a timestamp
> with an identifier and the encoded varbind.  The data is passed through
> some complicated system and, long story short, ends up in graphite.  Using
> the nonNegativeDerivative and scaleToSeconds functions, I created a CPU
> graph to track all of the processes.  Computation-heavy single-threaded
> processes were hovering around 100%, so I think I did everything right.
>
> I recently upgraded the systems to 14.04 and net-snmp 5.7.2 and noticed
> that my data points were alternating between 0 and 200% ... I took a closer
> look by launching 'yes' in the background, and comparing 5.4.3 and 5.7.2
> with:
>
> watch -d "snmpget -v2c -c public localhost
> HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrSWRunPerfCPU.6650"
>
> I found that net-snmp 5.4.3 would update every time I made the request,
> net-snmp 5.7.2 was behaving more like a step function.  I used strace and
> fond that net-snmp 5.4.3 reads /proc/6650/stat each time it's queried while
> 5.7.2 will read all of /proc/*/stat into memory every 30 seconds, and
> respond to queries with the latest value.  That made sense based on my
> results because my original query interval was 15 seconds, so I would see
> zero change in the hrSWRunPerfCPU every other time I queried.
>
> Is there any way I can get net-snmp 5.7.2's process table to actually
> check the procfs rather than reading from memory, or should I just make 30
> seconds the minimum resolution/interval in my data?
>
> Regards,
> Vince
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users