Re: CIS hardening?

John Bize <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:15:28 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'll take a shot at this.

 1. For an authoritative reply however, one should probably direct CIS
    questions to CIS.
 2. However, any reasonable security posture would have you disable all
    unused services.  This is simply SOP to reduce the attack surface.
 3. As for net-snmp specifically, it's always a good idea to check the
    Certs.  But depending on the document you are referencing, that is
    likely just the SNMP package installed on your system by default.
 4. And finally, SNMP v1 and v2c are insecure and can potentially
    (depending on configuration) expose sensitive internal information
    to unknown, unauthorized, and unauthenticated actors.
 5. If you must use SNMP on a hardened system, use (configure) SNMP v3.


On 19-Apr-2021 3:47 PM, Mike Eggleston wrote:
> Why does CIS hardening say to remove the net-snmp package from Linux?
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users