Re: Would it be ok practice to put sequence OID elements to traps?
Bill Fenner <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:14:56 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF4SogaSdLnE8ORk20E+Ui4JyUmECCJeJzanrk-EBRWRFHdm=A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 7:44 AM Janne Paalijarvi <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it considered ok to put sequence OID elements to trap contents? > If I understand the question right, you're asking about including objects belonging to a table? Many trap definitions do this; when constructing the trap, you have to be careful to include the full OID of the instance you're replying with (e.g., ifIndex.42, not just ifIndex, even though the OBJECTS in the linkUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE just says "ifindex"). Meaning, given linkUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE OBJECTS { ifIndex, ifAdminStatus, ifOperStatus } you should construct the trap with, e.g., ifIndex.42 = 42 ifAdminStatus.42 = up ifOperStatus.42 = down (using those arguments to the "snmptrap" command should create a well-formed varbind list for a linkUp trap.) Bill _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users