Routing Problem (was: Re: Startup messages)
PD <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nocat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Scott,
Thank you for your advice that really solve out problem.
But we still have the other problem that seems to be a routing problem.
We does not know whether this can be insert into initialize.fw file or not.
our network
192.168.105.0/25
main router ----- nocat box ----- AP ----- client
main router : 192.168.105.8
nocat box (fxp0) 192.168.105.16/25
nocat box (dc0) 192.168.105.130/29
ap (wan port) 192.168.105.131/29
ap (ethernet port) 192.168.105.193/26
client using DHCP IP pool 192.168.105.194-254/26
from other terminal that using IP 1 - 126, we can ping to AP wan port, but not
AP ethernet port and other pc that using IP 194-254.
seems that nocat box did not pass / allow the routing of 192.168.105.192/26
Questions, how to pass 192.168.105.192/26 via nocat ?
I did try to insert "{ipfw} allow 192.168.105.192/26 to any via
{internaldevice}" into initialize.fw, but still does not solve the problem.
My AP is WRT54G that does not allow wan port and ethernet port within the same
IP subnet.
Regards
PD
> I've added the following options to my kernel:
>
> options IPDIVERT
> options IPFIREWALL
> options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
> options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=5000
> options DUMMYNET
> options HZ=1000
>
> Read /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES for full descriptions of the options.
>
> "options DUMMYNET" allows you to use pipes and queues to shape the traffic.
> I shape the traffic so the people using our public access points don't use
> too much of our bandwidth. There is also a section of ipfw man page
> devoted to traffic shapeing and dummynet.
>