Re: connecting nocat dhcp issue
Matt Opie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nocat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Maybe not if the DSL modem is doing NAT. But I agree that the two ports need to be on different subnets so the gateway can act as intended (ie a fancy rule based router) eg 192.168.1.95 192.168.200.96 Cheers Matt ulrich schwarz wrote: >Kevin Hawkins schrieb: > > >> have a no cat gateway with the following >>eth1 192.168.1.95 plugged into dsl modem >>eth2 192.168.1.96 plugged into wan of wrt54g >> >> >... > > >>and I cant access the internet or ping from laptop. so >> >> > >shouldn't there be a public IP on the eth1 connected to the modem? > >_______________________________________________ >NoCat mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.nocat.net/mailman/listinfo/nocat > > ======================================================================= This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended addressee. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or lost by reason of this transmission. If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no other act on the email. Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been altered or corrupted during transmission. =======================================================================