Re: 100% CPU usage ?

On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 15:02 -0600, Schuyler Erle wrote:
> Casey, that's exactly the reason why I chose glib 1.2 over 2.x - the
> glib 2.0 binaries are literally four times the size of glib 1.2, and I
> wanted the enhanced data types that glib offered without all the bloat
> of 2.0. I *think* that my latest changes will make the busy looping go
> away -- but I would really appreciate it if some folks could test the
> latest CVS version and let me know.

Thanks for the insight.  I hadn't considered that the size could be that
much bigger.

> If you have the opportunity to send me your glib 2.0 patch offlist, I
> would still like to see it, just for my edification. Thanks for your
> work on this project!
> 

Will do.

Casey