Re: LocalNetwork question.
Schuyler Erle <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nocat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* On 2-Aug-2005 at 3:22PM PDT, Chip Mefford said: > > Okay, my "regular" folks whine every now and again about nocat. Seeing > how I don't have an "auth" service set up. in nocat.conf, if I specify > LocalNetwork 172.24.24.224/27 (on a /26 subnet) would that mean that > nocat would only trap .224-255 and leave 192-223 alone? > > Meaning, folks with assigned (via dhcp) addresses in x.192/27 would > just roll on past, and folks in the dynamic pool of 224/27 get > the splash ? Unfortunately, that's not how it works. You'd have to stick a custom rule or two in your initialize.fw to cause the firewall to circumvent NoCat for that IP range. SDE