Re: NoCat hardware requirements
Alain Fauconnet <[email protected]> Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:26:02 +0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nocat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:56:02AM +0200, Fabio Casadei wrote: > Hi, > im trying some hardware to line out NoCatAuth (gateway and authserv on > the same machine, Fedora Core 3) hardware minimum requirements. > Any suggestions (possibly supported with production machines examples > and number of users served)? I can't quote any figures because we haven't been that far as rolling NoCat out in production mode, but the major bottleneck appeared to be the Perl processes created at client login time. It's kind of easy to bring a machine on its knees would anything go wrong (http scans by worms etc.). However even the highest-end machine will be vulnerable to this. So you may need to take extra steps like custom iptables rules with rate limits. > > Has anybody installed NoCat on the same machine where a proxy-based web > contents filtering system resides? Yes I have. Squid + SquidGuard. But only for a testbed. > Any suggestion about the content filtering system to choose (im looking > for an open-source one)? SquidGuard is simple (simplistic?), works fine but isn't fancy. Many free online blacklists exists that you can feed it with. DansGuardian is more advanced, but newer and somewhat more complex IMO. AFAIK not many free blacklists available if any. > How such a system will increase minimum hw requirements? In my experience SquidGuard doesn't generate as much overhead as could be feared if properly configured and used only for filtering domains and URLs using the table approach (not the regexp). I can't talk about DansGuardian. I've really only played with it. Squid by itself requires fast CPUs and more importantly a lot of RAM and fast disks if you let it have a big cache. On the other hand if you're only interested in content filtering, you can trim down the caching part a lot. Greets, _Alain_