Re: Pop-Up blockers
"Espen H. Koht" <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:07:39 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nocat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Given the associated security risks with this I think a neater = solution to this is what the University of Cambridge has done with = their "Lapwing" wireless service. Instead of automatically redirecting = to the original request from the login confirmation page and then = popping up a keep-alive window, it is the login confirmation page = which contains the keep-alive code plus a link to open the originally = requested page in a new window, from which you start your web = browsing. This gets around the pop-up issue since user-initiated = window creations aren't normally blocked by pop-up blockers. User can = of course minimise the login confirmation page they way they would the = classic pop up window, so the fact that it is a normal sized browser = window isn't much of an issue. Unfortunately doing this is not a simple configuration change since it = requires code changes to NoCat. Espen On 24 Nov 2007, at 17:28, Shawn Kondel wrote: > We found this to be annoyance for our users that have some kind of = > pop-up blocker whether it be IE7, IE6 w/ XPSP2, FF, or 3rd party, so = > our solution for time being was to extend the renewal idle timeout = > to 24 hours (NoCat gateway daemon gets restarted at 1:00am daily by = > cron job) and take out the renewal popup html code from the = > login_ok.html file on NoCat authentication server. In other words, = > the login user gets access to Internet all day without having to re- = > authenticate unless the user gets a different IP address later on. = > This poses some problems when a new user gets the old user's IP = > address that has already been authenticated. (Temporary solution is = > the have a bigger DHCP dynamic IP address pool than the average = > login users. DHCP server would give the users same IP address as = > long as possible and would not reallocated old IP address to another = > user unless all the new IP addresses from the pool are used up) > > Another solution (which I am working on) is to modify the gateway = > source code to monitor packet activities from IPtables and if there = > any packet in-activities for number of defined minutes, flushed = > associated IP address from the IPtables chain. The users would have = > to re-authenticate again if they tries to get back on again. > > The problem I have now is how to deal with users that have browsers = > with proxy settings enabled. > > > Shawn > Utah State University IT > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] = > ] On Behalf Of Eduardo Bejar > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [NoCat] Pop-Up blockers > > Hi everyone, > > I=B4ve been reading the mailing list archives and haven't found a = > definitive > answer about this issue. Regarding pop-up blockers, how are you = > handling > the NoCat pop-up window that opens after a user authenticates? > > Have you found a way to load this window despite the use of pop-up > blockers, specially the one included in IE7? > > Thanks and regards, > > Edo > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NoCat mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nocat.net/mailman/listinfo/nocat > > > _______________________________________________ > NoCat mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nocat.net/mailman/listinfo/nocat