Re: [c-nsp] Third party optics

Shawn L <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.cisco
Message-ID <CAMOTM_QN7_FAJVh44aiOh+F=Ug8Cq2t-7V9azQt19N=_fcNx0A@mail.gmail.com>
We pretty much do the same thing.  A couple of cisco optics on-hand just in
case, otherwise we use 3rd party.  A lot of the times, the third-party
optics are coded to look just like Cisco optics, so we haven't even had to
swap them out before filing a case for something.  As long as it's not
specific to the actual optic.

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:25 PM Doug McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 02:04:32PM -0400, harbor235 wrote:
> > How are your organizations dealing with Cisco equipment and usage of
> third
> > party optics?
> >                           1) Cisco or "third party"?
> >                            2) Cisco policy regarding third party
> components?
> >
> > Is it worth the risk?
>
> We have a few real Cisco part spares around in each datacenter.
> Most optics are 3rd party. (FS)
>
> If there is an issue with support (which does come up occasionally,
> but certainly not every case), then we swap in a real Cisco optic part
> and continue with the case.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.