Re: [c-nsp] policer on ASR1001X

Thanks, Lukasz.

For clarity, my requests didn't fall on deaf ears. The local AM team 
escalated all the way to the TME's and BU heads in San Jose, and they 
gave the answer to move to the NCS540 because the ASR920 is on its way out.

Very possible that things changed since then, which would be great for 
customers. Glad to hear that you, indeed. But we are way down our path 
to migrate away now.

That said, we still do like the CSR1000v very much as our out-of-path 
RR. Considering the current code is full of great features, many of 
which we use and many that we don't, we'd be keeping that anyway even if 
IOS XE were to ever disappear :-).

Trying to run Junos or IOS XR as an RR just hurts my eyes. So I'll give 
IOS XE that :-).

Mark.

On 9/10/21 18:25, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I’m from a different BU, but overall - yes, I remember some of the discussions we’ve had in the past. I’m very sorry it turned out this way.
>
> Unfortunately, some of the decisions are not made on single-platform level, and I do get you’re frustrated because either there’s no one to talk to, answers are not satisfactory or there’s simply black hole - no answers.
>
> Just for everyone to know - SP team changed the way they process feature requests from Customers and Account Teams. Tools by themselves won’t solve any problem, but right now it should be much easier to track all of the requests received across the board. If you, like Mike, are frustrated with the suggestions or requests falling to „deaf ears”, please try once again.
>
> And hey - solid competition is what can move us all forward :)
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/