Re: [c-nsp] FIB scale on ASR9001
Drew Weaver <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We have a couple of these in production also are you planning on going with the 9902 or 9903 or are you switching altogether? I would love it if they could just make an ASR that has 4xQSFP28 ports and a slot to add 4-6 more. Would be perfect for us assuming that it wasn't $80,000 Thanks, -Drew -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Friday, November 5, 2021 3:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FIB scale on ASR9001 On 11/4/21 21:40, Tom Hill wrote: > It's Typhoon (2nd Gen) so 4M v4, or 2M v6. > > Assuming you don't use any of it for anything else, e.g. labels. > You're likely to run into other limits first (PPS, RAM, cXR > discontinued...) As Tom said. We are retiring ours, because CPU performance for just 2x IPv4 + 2x IPv6 full sessions is too much for the Freescale PPC CPU. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_cisco-2Dnsp&d=DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=OPufM5oSy-PFpzfoijO_w76wskMALE1o4LtA3tMGmuw&m=C7wKxKAk_X4Dj694Z1yw_7Xb6Ikb6geQAHieGuLY3m8&s=OT9np_a5fIrYimJQHaBdBYxjCv4XflIOQlPlsp7f2kU&e= archive at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dnsp_&d=DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=OPufM5oSy-PFpzfoijO_w76wskMALE1o4LtA3tMGmuw&m=C7wKxKAk_X4Dj694Z1yw_7Xb6Ikb6geQAHieGuLY3m8&s=LG52djHtxAe9ZmsIoF5Ns724PGtiOn4hiPWec0O_4pk&e= _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/