Re: [c-nsp] FIB scale on ASR9001

Shawn L <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.cisco
Message-ID <CAMOTM_Qp2fYy3tb0JzRFaR9pKN6a5MH5Xh4TNBizcChf=Vk5MQ@mail.gmail.com>
I'll second Tom on this one.  I actually have 2 9001S routers (the S is the
port / memory limited license).  They have 2 full feeds (V4 and V6) and
some EIGRP, and that's about it.  Currently handling things fine.  Though
only doing ~ 5gig in/out at this point.

Shawn

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 1:04 PM Tom Hill <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 05/11/2021 07:53, Mark Tinka wrote:
> > We are retiring ours, because CPU performance for just 2x IPv4 + 2x IPv6
> > full sessions is too much for the Freescale PPC CPU.
>
> I may live to regret asking this, but...
>
> I've run a lot more than that on a 9001, and it handled it all with
> aplomb. They're not as fast as an RSP440 (or RSP880) but in no way did I
> find them to be liabilities when running alongside measurably faster
> routers in the same ASN. They were extremely competent, in fact.
>
> So how are you measuring this, and/or how is the issue manifesting?
>
> --
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.