Re: [c-nsp] FIB scale on ASR9001

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 08:27:44AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> We have nothing against the forwarding performance of the ASR9001. It's 
> the control/management plane that seems to be slowing down (at least for 
> us, anyway) with newer code and a growing Internet DFZ.

"newer code" might be the key issue here - what version are you on?

Our 9001 have been extremely well-behaved in regards to BGP performance
and robustness.  Not as fast as the RSP440, but still well up to the
job.

We're on 6.5.3 ("nothing interesting in newer versions, and still 
supported").

gert
-- 
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you 
 feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted 
 it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
                             Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             [email protected]

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJhjMPAAAoJEB2Cnv7KVigSnC4L/1Mx8IdXTA84n1ktdlQq9+xI
R8AUpJUdSS8k9JvJKBmXCqLbsn1xxytKA7ELt9p07DNhLbz17Vms8saJtyCDJFOb
zXoa9lJgsnMQuLrGIhhO9s6MNb0DE92EB5pXAJlEj6N/EK/wZ+RaiCos0adYFwBf
cLteIaVPUrw2FvrU8fJQFAnSxCFXEdEIl5GKSM7JvVuBvHlaZf5es7LoEh6hwj/T
gBaIEE8pDbp1htBYFlGBNssfwvK96LeutY7pFttUfTNcxdP8T5cDWFCsLxiZWsR8
B5KmySStr4gfx/ijjgNT6iqRv3lY/sndLI3lpUAW7Gcur0sz5+xb7JbURPSQujzN
N8htGcGXrxV880QEzHPviwDYptx8jdocK8wQbJAyr1hYRpR7x9pq6T6jmZCqt03e
deisEZx2ap3micSVQC98LjbKoINNg+p3xJVzmN+KiZexsBbBywjfuySsLMYFOFte
vrwHkGw3Kp+gb2zR1sBIWlx/BEgNbtlZMvBl80YmNw==
=rXO9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----