Re: [c-nsp] FIB scale on ASR9001
Saku Ytti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAeewD9zTSK-hqPiSBzmOMa=bc4C4Jo0EhKc6+dkcnJ+gshDaA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 at 21:23, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > And that is all fine, provided YOU, as the operator, are deciding policy. I don't think IETF is making standards for specific implementation. The implementation agnostic solution is to keep all routes which we rejected due to consulting validation database, regardless of validation state. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/