Re: [c-nsp] Link down affecting BGP peer

Blake Dunlap <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.cisco
Message-ID <CAJvB4tm+YWF6wc0MqMe33EOdrzMfapeoz+YwjF2B7bBpT5ZXbg@mail.gmail.com>
Is it about 4000 msec of flapping? Perhaps the bundle member in question is
delaying to go down for some reason?

On Thu, May 5, 2022, 11:07 Hank Nussbacher <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have 4 individual links defined as part of a Bundle-ether (IOS-XR
> 5.3.3 on ASR9010):
>
> interface TenGigE0/2/0/1
>   bundle id 2 mode active
>   flow-control bidirectional
>   carrier-delay up 100 down 4000
> ! They are all part of a bundle...
> interface Bundle-Ether2
>   mtu 9192
>   bundle minimum-active links 2
>
> When I shut off just 1 of these 4 links - the bundle stays up yet
> certain BGP sessions flap for about 5 seconds - different peers
> depending on which of the 4 links gets turned down.
>
> My BGP config:
> router bgp 378
>   rpki server x.139.197.151
>    transport tcp port 8282
>    refresh-time 600
>   !
>   bgp log neighbor changes detail
>   address-family ipv4 unicast
>    bgp dampening 5 750 3000 10
>    bgp attribute-download
> !
>   neighbor x.x.125.1
>    remote-as xxxx5
>    address-family ipv4 unicast
>     send-community-ebgp
>     soft-reconfiguration inbound
>
> What could be causing the bgp peer to flap even though the LAG stays up?
>
> Thanks,
> Hank
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.