Re: [c-nsp] [External] VPC + MLAG but more of a general question I guess

Hunter Fuller <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.cisco
Message-ID <CAMFTxdRHF2obHryAihpQknz28OLoRdqvPRPgCR54LwttakWHhQ@mail.gmail.com>
I think I am kinda confused about what you are doing.

> VPC ID 18
> C9336-1 -> Downstream-Switch1
> C9336-2 -> Downstream-Switch1
>
> VPC ID 19
> C9336-1 -> Downstream-Switch2
> C9336-2 -> Downstream-Switch2

If the downstream switches operate as a MCLAG pair (basically a "vPC"
but not Cisco, whatever technology that may be), then this config
would be incorrect, you would want to use the same vPC ID on every
link.

If Downstream-Switch1 and Downstream-Switch2 have no "shared brain" at
all, then your config is correct to provide uplink redundancy for
these two switches.

Are you using the same Port-channel number on both 9336 also?

If all your ducks are in a row as above, then you are obviously
experiencing maybe a cosmetic bug on your Downstream-Switchx, but you
are apparently also either experiencing either a problem with the
LACPDUs that the 9336 is generating, or the other vendor switch is
experiencing a problem consuming them.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.