Re: [c-nsp] [External] VPC + MLAG but more of a general question I guess
Hunter Fuller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMFTxdRHF2obHryAihpQknz28OLoRdqvPRPgCR54LwttakWHhQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I think I am kinda confused about what you are doing. > VPC ID 18 > C9336-1 -> Downstream-Switch1 > C9336-2 -> Downstream-Switch1 > > VPC ID 19 > C9336-1 -> Downstream-Switch2 > C9336-2 -> Downstream-Switch2 If the downstream switches operate as a MCLAG pair (basically a "vPC" but not Cisco, whatever technology that may be), then this config would be incorrect, you would want to use the same vPC ID on every link. If Downstream-Switch1 and Downstream-Switch2 have no "shared brain" at all, then your config is correct to provide uplink redundancy for these two switches. Are you using the same Port-channel number on both 9336 also? If all your ducks are in a row as above, then you are obviously experiencing maybe a cosmetic bug on your Downstream-Switchx, but you are apparently also either experiencing either a problem with the LACPDUs that the 9336 is generating, or the other vendor switch is experiencing a problem consuming them. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/