Re: [c-nsp] v6 vrrp
Charles Sprickman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Jul 15, 2022, at 4:12 AM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 7/15/22 07:56, Saku Ytti wrote: > >> >> Juniper is coming up with licensing but have strategically decided not >> to do technical enforcement. I am not against licensing wholesale, but >> I want it to be a commercial problem, not a technical one. I'm fine >> calling home and reporting non-compliance. > > Agreed, I also like the Juniper model. The licensing is more commercial and support, than technical (except for PPPoE session scaling in BNG applications, IIRC). > > But like Charles, we are also doing less and less work on Cisco. The last time we did an IOS XE upgrade on the ASR1002-X and ASR1006, it was anywhere between 21 - 42 steps to move from 3.x to 17.x :-(. Oh my god… I’m going to be consultant shopping. That’s well above my pay grade. If you’re not looking for any new features from IOS and simply want to have a secure/patched version, is there any option at all to park in XE and stay there? There’s a handful of these that have become pretty dumb big routers w/very simple BGP and not much else due to the world moving to metro-e as the go-to access option. Thanks, Charles > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/