Re: [c-nsp] storm-control errdisable with no traffic or vlan
Joe Maimon via cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > > Make the port a routed port (= ingress packets go nowhere), set up > a SPAN session, find out what sort of packets are coming in (broacast, > multicast, unknown-unicast) and how many of them. Adjust limits, > as ytti said. Interesting approach, even if not sure it will get anywhere on this one. > > While I agree to "have storm-control anywhere" - if this is intended > to be a routed link, limits can be fairly high (the only reason why > you want storm-control is to protect the 4900M's CPU, not anything > else in the network). 10k is typical value I use for network protection purposes, anything serious is gonna exceed that in a heartbeat. > > OTOH, a 4900M? really? > > gert > 1) 200-300 used 2) 8 onboard X2, 2 slots for modules for 4/8 X2, 8port X2 modules support twingig, or 20 GigT, or 8 10gT (those are pricey) 3) 4500 platform vs. 3xxx 4) no licensing subscriptions 5) Software only 4 years old Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-ENTSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.2(4)E7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2018 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 18-Sep-18 13:49 by prod_rel_team 6) 2U, Dual PS, external CF, 4 post mounting 7) Rock stable. uptime is 3 years, 27 weeks, 23 hours, 5 minutes There are plenty of places left for gear like this, especially as CPE and especially considering the alternatives I see people putting in. If you got suggestions for gear less than 4figures with similar or better qualities, I am all ears. Joe _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/