Re: [c-nsp] How to disable ILMI/SNMP CSCvs33325

On 20/09/2022 15:54, Simon Leinen wrote:
> Gert Doering via cisco-nsp writes:
>> Hi,
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 03:47:09PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2022 15:40, Gert Doering wrote:
>> https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/support/docs/csa/cisco-sa-20010227-ios-snmp-ilmi.html
> 
>> [..]
>>>> That said, I tried to reproduce it on our boxes, and neither the ASR920
>>>> nor the lone ASR1000 reponds to SNMP v1 or v2c queries with community
>>>> "ILMI", with nothing in the config to block it (same source host can
>>>> query with one of the configured SNMP communities).  This is on IOS XE
>>>> 16.6.10 and 15.5(3)S10 respectively.  Seems you need something extra.
>>>
>>> It is V3.  Here is a Shodan snippet from one of dozens of alerts we get
>>> per day:
> 
>> Good to know.  Looking at shodan, I see that both types of devices here
>> are listed as well (ewww!).
> 
>> So, need to figure out what the magic -v3 incantation of snmpget is
>> to make this work... (every time I tried v3 so far has led to
>> "more grey hair").
> 
> Yeah, I'd like to reproduce/understand that too.  I actually remember
> both ILMI (in ATM, sigh) and SNMPv3.  One of SNMPv3's distinguishing
> features is that it DOESN'T use community strings anymore.  So I'm a bit
> confused as to what the problem is.  Is there some implicit mapping from
> SNMPv1/2c communities to SNMPv3 usernames/passwords? Or are the Shodan
> reports referring to information leaks from SNMPv3 engine-ID discovery?
> (e.g. CSCtw74132)

Indeed the SNMP leaks appear to be exactly CSCtw74132 which we did not 
know about nor did Cisco TAC :-(

Good to know the people here are more knowledgeable than Cisco :-)

Regards,
Hank

> 
> Cheers,

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/