Re: [c-nsp] MTU and PMTUD

Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.cisco
Message-ID <CAAeewD8=2d3KEN98AKq207mmbH+wWifee4J80e5O5kxHD7Fdgw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 11:25, Marcin Kurek <[email protected]> wrote:

> Interesting, but why would 'sh run' or 'write' raise an interrupt?
> Isn't this a branch in code that handles the CLI?

Maybe to access NVRAM? I don't know for sure, I didn't pursue it, I
just know I could observe it.

> I'm not sure if I'm reading it right - on the one hand, the interrupts are disabled, but on the other hand, some CLI commands actually raise them?

I don't know if IOS does polling or interrupt for NIC packets, but
there are tons of reasons to raise interrupt, not just NIC.

> Would you mind elaborating on why going above 4k would mean "newish features" and what are they?

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8654.html

> So here CSR1kv is initiating the connection to XR box advertising MSS 8936 (as expected).
> However, peer MSS is 1240, which is not quite expected, considering XR config:

But it was [8936, 1240].min - so it was 'negotiated' here to the
smallest? If you change the 8936 end to 1239, then that will be used,
regardless who starts it.

-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.