Re: [c-nsp] Internet border router recommendations and experiences
Aaron Gould via cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
https://apps.juniper.net/home/port-checker/index.html nice website to check port mix capabilities. -Aaron On 2/22/2023 5:06 PM, Thomas Scott via cisco-nsp wrote: > Yes - 400 Gbps throughput total If I recall correctly. > >> The MX204 has four rate-selectable ports that can be configured as > 100-Gigabit Ethernet ports or 40-Gigabit Ethernet ports, or each port can > be configured as four 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports (by using a breakout > cable). The MX204 also has eight 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports. The four > rate-selectable ports support QSFP28 and QSFP+ transceivers, whereas the > eight 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports support SFP+ transceivers > > https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/hardware/mx204/topics/concept/mx204-description.html > > Best Regards, > -Thomas Scott > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:19 PM Eric Louie via cisco-nsp < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Oh geez, I just realized I left a zero off the interface - we need 100G >> interfaces both upstream (x1) and downstream (x2) >> That probably changes the product choices a little bit. >> Anyone with 100G Internet feeds want to let me know what you're using for >> a border router? I saw one reply for Arista already. >> Does the MX204 have 100GE interfaces and throughput? >> -e- >> >> Eric Louie >> 619-743-5375 Cell/text >> Stay in this moment, it's the only one you really have >> Take the time to be compassionate today >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 12:43:52 PM PST, Mark Tinka >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2/22/23 20:29, Eric Louie wrote: >> >> >> Mark, thanks. We were quoted a MX304 for the Internet edge from >> Juniper. How has your experience been with it? are you 10G upstream and >> downstream? Any IPS on the 10G connection? >> >> The MX304 is not worth the money, for as long as the MX204 exists. >> >> >> >> >> We tried an NCS-5501 and it was a disaster, in a word. The 10G >> interface, uRPF, source-based blackholing, and routing table depth with >> Cisco is a limiting factor in their product line. >> >> Broadcom-based systems should always be looked at with one eye open, >> i.e., test test test before you commit. This applies to any vendor, not >> just Cisco. >> >> Mark. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- -Aaron _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/