Re: [c-nsp] Internet border router recommendations and experiences
Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/26/23 16:29, Phil Bedard wrote: > SMUs were a good idea, but not really great in practice. Most > customers I work with do not want to manage application level patches, > just entire images, even in cases where they are just a process restart. > > XR for a number of years now has had the concept of a “golden ISO”. > It’s a single image either built by Cisco or customers can build their > own that include the base software and the SMUs in a single image. > You just issue a single “install replace myiso.iso” and that’s it. > I did not know that. But then again, we haven't used IOS XR platforms in a while, because we got put off. Basically, Cisco got this wrong the first time, took advice on what operators wanted to make it better, but fumbled still. We moved on. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/