Re: [c-nsp] NCS IOS-XR rant (was:Re: Internet border router recommendations and experiences)

I agree, I mentioned earlier most  just want a single image where they load the image, reboot the box if that’s required, and that’s it.  Managing application level software patches isn’t something most want to keep track of or maintain.  Whle the flexibility is there to do that, it’s not necessarily something I would advocate.

Thanks,
Phil

From: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> on behalf of Tarko Tikan via cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 3:56 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NCS IOS-XR rant (was:Re: Internet border router recommendations and experiences)
hey,

> With XR7 the idea was to mimic how things are done with Linux repos
> by having a specific RPM repo for the routers and the patches which
> is managed similar to Linux and that’s how all software is packaged
> now.

I'd argue you'd want your devices to be cattle and not pets. When doing
upgrades you want all your devices end up in same state and GISO
provides that. When doing investigation you don't have to go and compare
specific RPM versions that someone might have installed etc.

--
tarko

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/