Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table
Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:16:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/29/23 11:05, Fraser McGlinn wrote: > Would this be a case where vasi-left and vasi-right interfaces are appropriate? Essentially same as an LT in Junos. > Not as elegant for sure, but should function. IIRC, VASI support was only on the MSB (Multi Service Blade) on the XR 12000 platform. There was no support for the ASR9000 (I was working on a rather ancient ASR9001). If someone with more ASR9000 clue knows if support is now enabled for that platform, please chime in. We do use "virtual-router" routing instances in Junos to basically make a whole new router inside an existing router. But we don't use that feature too often because it impacts ultimate PFE performance in a way that a regular "vrf" routing instance does not. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/