Re: [c-nsp] Q. Is anyone deploying TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) on their BGP peering Sessions?
Gert Doering via cisco-nsp <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Sep 2023 09:05:42 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 08:48:44AM +0800, Barry Greene via cisco-nsp wrote:
> Q. Is anyone deploying TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) on their BGP peering Sessions?
Not me. Not sure if my vendors do support it (IOS XR and Arista EOS),
but I do not see significant benefit.
TBH, most of our (non-multihop) eBGP sessions do not even deploy MD5, as
the whole password management thing adds another source of operational
friction.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 630 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJlE9RGAAoJEB2Cnv7KVigSXw0L/i9t3ZwJ9qbTUF/ZYJ5F4udk b0Sgol0Wkg71oYnOQM95pXWYDY+C8ifdb+HogQCkyc8/LQScBqxFfxGyEDOm/PRz DpDk8TB2rXK6US9ByIjKg6VVoKQeDs+lv2jB7wap9/7bE1x2F4PncZSmNiwdDIPd rHKVIpRNBBbMa7P3TEJWsaaBfLBeZ+kP9VJXf9TLeAcUHuZR3+0sA7ERntXxlAtn OTTE6K9ZYGEBizo2Ir652hdu+/hbno/1rzKubn7hxRlpvnhrhR5HB7GiwlzGih/G pmvjmLaULNvTuox8VbTzSZUD3QNvIathaazyH2F9g/cRWAqaJp2hmnriBDSZncrj +kHi1UJopmZZMuM8H3QFWBPYVY8dvDbcsGyEAZaR04YRP1GmXtdnvl+jGymEceSn /MNP5Ly5CpY2s5PYeIWnzkW8MJggdPnxANva6Cn0ctyTIaweH7GR4dR9jTXc//gM leeaIwVoZska9G3cBCNd1Pz80rpOeOsYFdPSvUwAhg== =3/Qi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----