Re: [c-nsp] ACL to block udp/0?
Gert Doering via cisco-nsp <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Dec 2023 22:44:49 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 11:27:21PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp wrote:
> We encountered something strange. We run IOS-XR 7.5.2 on ASR9K platform.
>
> Had a user under udp/0 attack. Tried to block it via standard ACL:
>
>
> ipv4 access-list block-zero
> 20 deny udp any any eq 0
> 30 deny tcp any any eq 0
> 40 permit ipv4 any any
D'Wayne Saunders already pointed at this most likely being fragments -
large packet reflections, and all non-initial fragments being reported by
IOS* as "port 0" (so you should see 1500 byte regular UDP as well, with
a non-0 port number)
IOS XR syntax for fragment blocking is
deny ipv4 any any fragments
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 630 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJlb5nRAAoJEB2Cnv7KVigSJGkL/RC+/iVtdnZGS5ZGfzex20us 5BgRVuLWiMP+RmcDLOrKohMhnGvwFF4dCR10dTTLqoIXUMS6fVJU8fEV2HmT2+pS SFmCHUlAwA1exVSZiDFqupcU9EZPYo+Z7RKHbtqglzR5LMnURUuEBOf6qPfPsQpj RTg7kCnpYiM6z76QnHtBYOqvfhFHPAwoNx+NMF+5oDsYac4ewFJCVqr4XO84DFel e7nXDYdC+KG2b8JdVPzFMRHxquje2boZ4MhK2sL024Ne0mzOzUdZHLJ3KVSKyOh3 CiQtUODCk4ahtSg6Zn7cgMWYiTGrXXu92vYgRbQFUlT6Kd6fp58wmcNwKdxDvIID 6/L9XmyZMNS9sn1u+J8MVsRuAtkR3+G1fpX3NaUw6lvQ0WEgSmi7TZPhLlMPtbS5 KNG6zZUo5tW3QKtwn8Y6raI6kT9K/D82k/LjG4aIu7zKFX+BHR7r5D77RjfoG9E0 Opzb0APO8YZRYgS7vbrdTkwyzNfoDUHlSZM/zKKlyA== =DgGf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----