Re: [c-nsp] Support for CFP2
Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Jan 2024 14:59:18 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote on 19/01/2024 14:35: > At $dayjob we're working on turning up a 100G connection with a provider. > At this point, it looks like the only optic that's meets their criteria is > a CFP2. sounds like metro 100G connectivity. What sort of distances are involved, and is there a requirement for DWDM? If it's shorter distance and no DWDM, 100G LR4 extended reach might work (8dB power budget, compared to the usual 4dB for standard LR4). Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/