Re: [c-nsp] Recommendation for Cisco router with Full BGP Route
Gert Doering via cisco-nsp <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Mar 2025 08:22:51 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 02:26:28PM +0800, Pengembara T. via cisco-nsp wrote:
> I am looking for recommendations on a Cisco model that meets the
> following requirements:
>
> - Supports 4 BGP peers (both eBGP and iBGP), each with a full BGP
> table for IPv4 and IPv6
> - Smallest possible physical size (2U max if possible)
What interfaces are needed, and what throughput? 1G, 10G, 100G, more?
What is your budget range?
> - Prefer perpetual license
Haha... if you do not want license annoyance, you need to go shopping
elsewhere.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 630 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJnxqpLAAoJEB2Cnv7KVigSuCcL/R8DDI+sVJNqJoBJpMWRLZVE X1jpjh+FFAQhX8RzoHhAFPSjr35siX3HEcovbIbFivWfMMtErWFG87422MXsC/C8 QVSLD3YEApVUlDvNpMtJ5WFKKg/UmS2yisZQMfK+nLmbuZSaAYna6Vh9vJW/DPsj uibLChVrhUuSAYSFT81KhtkrOAkXy2YcleGt15tWos2TWhW8MXXcAwYs2fWtuMTi RrR6m65UnIDttf5IHzTQ1UdF4G8HCHEDkULPwCqOsL4wfwhhr8LndLl0M/c3XiQM JoccQ1ucLFZtJfBNXZJAHQy/HU/SQrjovH3fTBVyw9Bbe1Bqz7mENR4uiS1x64Y2 urRTlc6Igp1JJMBu708VpK70TQ4gj9+HruSaziWIHrz6mjHMAf0gPRbqVoeYhfK6 KqZl5JBVDKP+FQOzebKSlriec4v5T/JnurRvkj4z9rDz5qG1GMrHzJ3cHRk+9Ozd Xkn1dBT5QAHJ/bwF0OvJpWSnO7sBz4NKto0cyJ91eA== =VquQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----