Re: [c-nsp] Recommendation for Cisco router with Full BGP Route
Shawn L via cisco-nsp <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:37:22 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMOTM_QvOKAbr-Vyf7ve8YqRvH_WusdJ0Eu5a7XETzg0RZMr1w@mail.gmail.com> |
And the 9901 has been moved to (or very soon will be) end-of-sale. Now they want you to use the 9902. Sigh On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 10:29 AM Gert Doering via cisco-nsp < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 10:40:08PM +0800, Pengembara T. via cisco-nsp > wrote: > > Our concern more toward CPU utilization when handling bgp. Cpu will > > constantly high, long before the throughput hit 10G. > > On proper routers, packets forwarded will not be a concern to the CPU :-) > > With "5x 10Gbps", an ASR9001 would be a perfect match, but that's a > platform Cisco no longer wants to sell. The successors (ASR9901 etc) > are much bigger (100G ports) and just so expensive. > > So maybe one of these Catalyst 8000 would indeed be an option, if you > do not intend to connect to a big IXP. > > Or go Juniper and look for an MX204. > > gert > > -- > "If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you > feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never > doubted > it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor." > Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh > Mistress > > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/