Re: [f-nsp] Testing traffic forwarding issues on FESX448-PREM

Eldon Koyle <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.foundry
Message-ID <CAKJRP3QT8NZ8L=V-arH7wn61JBZTRKnAkaHGwYwB5D78mDiHZQ@mail.gmail.com>
We have had issues with one or two older FESX switches where they failed
intermittently (ie. it would work after a cold boot for a random period of
time, anywhere from days to months, then stop passing traffic on a port
region).  One was on a fesx 624hf+2xg that had well outlasted its useful
lifetime.  It was a good excuse to upgrade ;).  I seem to recall seeing
this behavior once before then, but I could be imagining things.

On Dec 8, 2016 5:08 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm working on testing several FESX448-PREM switches.
>
> One of the switches in my test group is known to be bad. It was previously
> installed as a top of cabinet switch, 42 servers were connected to it, all
> port lights came on, full duplex, no errors, low CPU, etc but ports 13-24
> would not forward traffic. As I understand it, this is due to a bad ASIC
> that covers port region 13-24.
>
> However, I now have this bad switch at my work bench and I cannot
> replicate the same forwarding issue with port region 13-24.
>
> At my work bench, I have port 1 as the uplink and I've been connecting my
> laptop to ports 2-48 sequentially using a CAT6 cable while running a
> continuous ping to a public IP. Interestingly, all the ports now work fine
> -- port region 13-24 no longer has forwarding issues.
>
> Does anyone know how this is possible? If there's a bad ASIC for port
> region 13-24, then I'd expect this problem to occur 100% of the time.
>
> I tried a couple other things afterwards. I had the theory that I needed
> more ports active at once in order to trigger the forwarding issue. So I
> first took a layer 2 switch and connected it on a bunch of ports with the
> FESX448. CPU usage immediately went to 100% on the FESX448. I figured
> something recursive routing was happening with the layer 2 switch. Next, I
> put the layer 2 switch into boot monitor mode so it wouldn't do any
> routing. That resolved the 100% CPU issue, but again I'm still unable to
> replicate the traffic forwarding issues with ports 13-24.
>
> Any suggestions on how I can replicate the forwarding issue and
> effectively test the remaining switches would be much appreciated!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>

_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.