Re: [f-nsp] Basic SNMP MIBs missing

Heh... this doesn't surprise me, since I was told by BTAC that they do
not "support" LLDP-MIB on fastiron/ICX devices.  We did end up getting
product management involved to get our issue fixed (namely, SNMP is
missing LLDP info for ports after a windows 10 device), but only in
the 8.0.30 code train (which has a lot of major changes from 8.0.10).

Speaking of which, is anyone running 8.0.30 on ICX switches with
mac-based authentication enabled?  They really want us to upgrade, but
it terrifies me since it sounds like the mac-auth/802.1x support was
re-written from the ground up (which could be good or bad).

-- 
Eldon

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Wilbur Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry you’re having issues with our MIB support. We try to support as many
> MIB OIDs as possible on as many platforms, but the reality is additional
> code needs to be written for every new OID. Optics can be specifically
> challenging because there’s no standard RFC based MIB to pull some types of
> data from the optic. I checked and this isn’t included in RFC-1213 (MIB-II),
> RFC-1775 (RMON),  RFC-4133 (Entity),
>
>
>
> Different optics manufacturers will also use different standards for passing
> this information; this standard also needs to also be compatible with the
> SERDES & chipset vendor’s own implementation. Sometimes supporting this
> isn’t as clear cut as we would like it to be and can take time & resources
> to build. We’re pretty good about supporting customer RFC’s though and we’ve
> added a lot of OID values to Fastiron & VDX based on customer requests, so
> we may add support for your request in a future release. Disclaimer: I’m not
> a Program Manager and can’t give you any insight into if/when.
>
>
>
> For VDX it does look like we support OID strings for portFault, noLight, etc
> on Fiber Channel ports (see string 1.3.6.1.4.1.1588.2.1.1.1.6.2.1.3).
> Because of the way VDX thinks of Ethernet & FC ports this OID may return
> data for an Ethernet optic…worth a try.
>
>
>
> Wilbur
>
>
>
>
>
> From: foundry-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 2:26 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [f-nsp] Basic SNMP MIBs missing
>
>
>
> Dear Community,
>
> Just wanted to share a basic / silly / simple experience I have gone through
> with our favorite $VENDOR.
>
> We use observium as an NMS for our backbone (MLXe / CERT, FCX,VDX) and I
> recently noticed lack of support for basic SNMP MIBs, in particular ones
> responsible for gathering transceivers' sensors values for FCX and VDX
> switchs.
>
> After opening cases with BTAC, I was told that it was perfectly normal (in
> 2017 !?!) because those specific MIBs were not implemented by design and
> that if I needed them, I should open up RFE requests... which I did with the
> help of my local SE :
>
> PRODRFE104332: regarding VDX implementation
> PRODRFE104333: regarding FCX implementation
>
>
> It has also made its' way on Observium's facebook page :
> https://fr-fr.facebook.com/observium/
>
> So, if you do love your favorite $VENDOR as much as we do and consider that
> your big bucks are worth having basic SNMP support in 2017, please start
> harrassing your SEs in order for SNMP MIBs to be implemented.
>
> I hope this feedback will inspire you.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp