Re: [f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

5.8g tentative GA is for May.

Best regards.



> Le 21 mars 2017 à 23:10, Daniel Schmidt <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> To follow up, I've been much happier with 05800fa.
> 
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Tony Sarendal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 2017-01-28 11:08 GMT+01:00 Clement Cavadore <[email protected]>:
>>> Hello Daniel,
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 18:04 -0700, Daniel Schmidt wrote:
>>> > I use the new 10x20 10G cards, which require 5.8.  The cards are not stable
>>> > for us, they crash periodically.  And, we had one or two mlx reboot for no
>>> > reason.  Things were better when we ran 5.6.  Of course, perhaps 5.8 would
>>> > be more stable without the cards so a grain of proverbial salt applies.
>>> 
>>> Did the TAC advised you something ? I am running 5.8.00ec on MLXe with
>>> BR-MLX-10Gx20 cards with no specific issues. The previous versions used
>>> to have a known bug with some ipsec packets which could crash the
>>> system. have a look there: TSB 2016-242-A & defect 617836
>>> 
>>> I previously talked about this defect on this mailing list, on
>>> 22-Sep-2016 12:18:22 (+2)
>> 
>> I have a dozen routers with 10Gx20, both -X2 and -M, running without issues.
>> I would prefer to keep it that way so any updates on your situation would be appreciated.
>> 
>> Regards Tony
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundry-nsp mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> 
> 
> 
> E-Mail to and from me, in connection with the transaction 
> of public business, is subject to the Wyoming Public Records 
> Act and may be disclosed to third parties.
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp