Re: [f-nsp] IPv6 DFZ and TCAM partitionning
Clement Cavadore <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:13:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.foundry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Youssef, Sales peoples are like young kids: You have to raise them and let them understand what they can or cannot sell :). And if they'd still insist to sell L3VPN, they'll have to ask the management to buy you some brand new toys :-) Clément On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:01 +0200, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: > Hi Clement :-) > > Sur, I thought of that. But knowing sales guys in my company, someone at > some point will have the brilliant idea of selling an L3VPN and then I will > be sc*$€wed. > > So, I'm trying to be creative here.... But I think my options are rather > limited. > > BR. > > > > > 2017-06-14 8:08 GMT+02:00 Clement Cavadore <[email protected]>: > > > I'd rather change my management method and switch to ipv4-ipv6-2 :-) > > > > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 01:02 +0200, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: > > > Dear Daniel, > > > > > > Is this really the only option ? > > > > > > Either shrinking the DFZ or upgrade to newer LPs ? > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 14 juin 2017 à 00:37, Daniel Schmidt <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > > > > > > > > No one really. My 2 cents: > > > > > > > > Use option #1, have each provider send you an additional default, and > > do an ASN filter list with a little help from this: > > > > https://github.com/ipcjk/asnbuilder > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> No one ? Really ?!? > > > >> > > > >> Y. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> Le 13 juin 2017 à 10:05, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <[email protected]> > > a écrit : > > > >>> > > > >>> Dear Foundry community, > > > >>> > > > >>> I'm about to revive an old trolly thread, but boy are they fun. > > > >>> > > > >>> With the growth of IPv6 DFZ over 32K entries, we have been receiving > > the following syslog error message on our MLXe gear : > > > >>> > > > >>> Jun 13 07:51:02:A:CAM IPv6 partition warning: total 32768 (reserved > > 0), free 6, slot 2, ppcr 1 > > > >>> Jun 13 07:51:02:A:CAM IPv6 partition warning: total 32768 (reserved > > 0), free 6, slot 2, ppcr 0 > > > >>> > > > >>> We receive full BGP feeds from multiple IP transit providers and > > YES, we DO filter prefixes over a /48 size. > > > >>> > > > >>> Our MLXe act as MPLS PEs and run the following hardware on NI58g : > > > >>> > > > >>> Module > > Status Ports Starting MAC > > > >>> M1 (left ):BR-MLX-MR2-X Management Module > > Standby(Ready State) > > > >>> M2 (right):BR-MLX-MR2-X Management Module > > Active > > > >>> F1: NI-X-HSF Switch Fabric Module > > Active > > > >>> F2: NI-X-HSF Switch Fabric Module > > Active > > > >>> F3: NI-X-HSF Switch Fabric Module > > Active > > > >>> S1: BR-MLX-10Gx4-X 4-port 10GbE Module > > CARD_STATE_UP 4 0024.38a4.fb00 > > > >>> S2: BR-MLX-10Gx4-X 4-port 10GbE Module > > CARD_STATE_UP 4 0024.38a4.fb30 > > > >>> S3: BR-MLX-1GFx24-X 24-port 1GbE SFP Module > > CARD_STATE_UP 24 0024.38a4.fb60 > > > >>> S4: BR-MLX-1GFx24-X 24-port 1GbE SFP Module > > CARD_STATE_UP 24 0024.38a4.fb90 > > > >>> > > > >>> For years, we have been using multi-service-4 CAM profil in order to > > provide pure IP connectivity and MPLS connectivity (mostly VPLS) to our > > clients. > > > >>> > > > >>> After investigating with BTAC, they told us that our hardware > > couldn't handle much more 32k with this profil : > > > >>> > > > >>> http://www.brocade.com/content/html/en/administration-guide/netiron- > > 05900-adminguide/GUID-F5A27733-F4A2-4367-8F83-E8A4C3DE6F0E.html > > > >>> > > > >>> We only use MPLS VRF for management prurposes. So, we are left with > > either : > > > >>> > > > >>> - Heavily filtering IPv6 bgp feeds + accepting a defaut route in > > order to get 1 MPLS VRF for management purposes, > > > >>> > > > >>> - Accepting full IPv6 BGP feed by migrating to ipv4-ipv6-2 Profile, > > and loose MPLS VRF. > > > >>> > > > >>> I seem to recall that someone on this list has been pushing Brocade > > to create a special profile to accomodate a very little number of MPLS > > VRFs. Did that happen ? > > > >>> > > > >>> Other than that, how do you guys handle this ? Maybe a nifty trick > > I'm not aware of ? > > > >>> > > > >>> Thank you for your wisdom. > > > >>> > > > >>> Best regards. > > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> foundry-nsp mailing list > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > E-Mail to and from me, in connection with the transaction > > > > of public business, is subject to the Wyoming Public Records > > > > Act and may be disclosed to third parties. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > foundry-nsp mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > > > > > > _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp