Re: [f-nsp] Spanning-tree event on single VLAN brings down LAG?
Eldon Koyle <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:32:05 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.foundry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKJRP3QrvCkB1Di-8OOH8_bQz=PT2NYQORyC3PypvofkoEy5AQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Which flavor of spanning tree are you running? -- Eldon On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:32 AM Howard, Christopher < [email protected]> wrote: > One vlan getting blocked by spanning tree should not bring down the lag. > The vlan should only block on the interfaces required to remove the loop. > As far as I know, if you have spanning tree enabled on the vlan, but > disabled on the physical port, then the physical port no longer > participates in spanning tree for any vlan. > > > Here's config from one of my switches. This is an ICX7750 with 8.0.30r > code, same code that ICX6610 can run. > > lag lag-name dynamic id 1 > > ports ethernet 1/1/2 ethernet 2/1/2 > > primary-port 1/1/2 > > deploy > > ! > > vlan 123 name vlan-name by port > > tagged ethe 1/1/2 ethe 2/1/2 > > spanning-tree 802-1w > > ! > > interface ethernet 1/1/2 > > spanning-tree 802-1w admin-pt2pt-mac > > > > A snipped output from "show 802-1w" below with vlans in both discarding > and forwarding states on that lag. > > --- VLAN 404 [ STP Instance owned by VLAN 404 ] > ---------------------------- > 1/1/2 128 > 2000 T F ALTERNATE DISCARDING 2000 0001609c9fd73700 > > --- VLAN 999 [ STP Instance owned by VLAN 999 ] > ---------------------------- > 1/1/2 128 > 2000 T F ALTERNATE DISCARDING 2000 0001609c9fd73700 > > --- VLAN 2007 [ STP Instance owned by VLAN 2007 ] > --------------------------- > 1/1/2 128 > 2000 T F ROOT FORWARDING 0 0000609c9fd73700 > > --- VLAN 2057 [ STP Instance owned by VLAN 2057 ] > --------------------------- > 1/1/2 128 > 2000 T F ROOT FORWARDING 0 0000609c9fd73700 > > -Christopher > > > On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 11:59 -0500, Frank Bulk wrote: > > We had network event deeper in our network that resulted in some kind of > > spanning tree event as evidenced by a TC (topology change) on our L2-only > > ICX6610 stack. What surprised us was that one VLAN going into a blocking > > state resulted in the south bound LAG going down. > > > This is probably not right, but the root bridge for VLAN 294 is on the > > ICX6610 stack. VLAN 294 is on both LAGs (and no other port/LAG) > > > Three questions: > > a) when a STP event occurs is it normal that a VLAN goes into Blocking on > > all the ports where it is present? > > b) when a VLAN goes into blocking should all the physical (or LAG) ports > > associated with that VLAN go down? > > c) does configuring spanning tree on the port-based VLAN but disabling > > spanning-tree on the physical (or LAG) ports prevent the physical port (or > > LAG) going down? > > > Frank > > > ============================================================================ > > ==== > > Oct 9 21:35:22 STP: VLAN 294 Port 1/3/6 Bridge TC Event (MakeBlking) > > Oct 9 21:35:22 STP: VLAN 294 Port 1/3/6 STP State -> BLOCKING (MakeBlking) > > Oct 9 21:35:25 System: Logical link on dynamic lag interface ethernet 2/3/8 > > is down. > > Oct 9 21:35:25 System: Logical link on dynamic lag interface ethernet 3/3/4 > > is down. > > Oct 9 21:35:26 System: Logical link on dynamic lag interface ethernet 3/3/8 > > is down. > > Oct 9 21:35:29 Trunk: Group (1/3/8, 2/3/8, 3/3/4, 3/3/8) removed by 802.3ad > > link-aggregation module. > > Oct 9 21:35:29 STP: VLAN 4 Port 1/3/8 STP State -> BLOCKING (PortDown) > > Oct 9 21:35:29 STP: VLAN 4 Port 1/3/8 STP State -> DISABLED (PortDown) > > etc. > > > Event > > | > > Transport > > | | > > | | (1/3/6 & 2/3/6) > > | | > > ICX6610 (L2) > > | | | | > > | | | | (1/3/8, 2/3/8, 3/3/4, 3/3/8) > > | | | | > > Core (L3) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundry-nsp mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp