Re: [f-nsp] SLX 9640 experiences
[email protected] Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:22:22 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.foundry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We have a pair of SLX 9640 up a running in our production environment with a dozen full-table bgp sessions (ipv4 + ipv6). No problems so far, but the we use them solely as core-elements for BGP and OSPF, no MPLS and other stuff. There are still some cosmetic issues, like SNMP running on the default vrf instead of the management-vrf and some show-commands which don't really work well.. (e.g. 'show route-map') Regards Patrick ______________________________________________________ I m p r o W a r e A G - Network Services ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________ > Am 03.06.19 um 12:50 schrieb Robert Hass: >> Hi >> I'm looking for users of new SLX 9640. We consider that platform as >> MLXe replacement in Internet (full DFZ) Edge/Core segments. Any >> problems / comments ? >> >> BTW. Did anyone compared SLX 9640 versus Arista 7280 or NCS 5501-SE >> ? I'm also happy to hear feedback. >> >> Rob >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundry-nsp mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp