Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
Karl Gerhard via juniper-nsp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.juniper |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18/10/2023 18:55, Tom Beecher via juniper-nsp wrote: > Juniper licensing is honor based. Won't impact functionality, will > just grump at you on commits. It depends. MACSEC on EX and QFX first had a license warning and a permanent minor alert when configured on these platforms. With Junos 18 they introduced MACSEC License Enforcement, i.e. no more MACSEC for you if you don't have a valid license installed. https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/MACsec-license-enforcement-on-EX-and-QFX-Series-Switches?language=en_US Introducing license warnings and minor alerts when conifguring a static route on MX304 might be a sign of things to come. When buying MX304, you are now running the risk of this device only being able to work as a switch after a firmware upgrade, unless you have a valid license installed. Regards Karl > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:32 AM Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 10/18/23 15:47, Aaron1 via juniper-nsp wrote: >> >>> Also, I get a license warning when committing OSPF and LDP. We got a >> license from our account team and now we don’t see that message anymore >> >> Any details on what this license does, and if there is any operational >> risk if you don't apply it? >> >> Mark. >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp