Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

Ola Thoresen via juniper-nsp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.juniper
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 25.10.2023 19:20, Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp wrote:

> Crist, not quite 100% accurate. Perpetual License are permeant and last forever, but with newer Flex License structure also require a SW Support Contract. Subscription based licenses of course expire at end of the subscription date, but do include SW Support.
>
> Trial and Demo licenses always come with end date, usually 60-90 days in the future. I am not 100% sure about expiration for Lab Licenses.

But the main issue here was whether the licenses are trust based or not.

Which means that even _without_ a license, an MX304 should be able to do 
almost anything that requires a license (except bng, macsec and possibly 
a few other special use cases) - although it would cause nagging in the 
logs and when committing.

I think this was cleared up earlier, that the OP probably experienced 
some other bug.

That is what's important for us. That functions don't stop working if a 
subscription license expires, and that you can try out a feature without 
buying a license first.


/Ola (T)


> FYI Only, Rich
>
> Richard McGovern
> Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks
> 978-618-3342
>
> I’d rather be lucky than good, as I know I am not good
> I don’t make the news, I just report it
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> On 10/25/23, 11:02 AM, "Crist Clark" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the key here is that the OP had evaluation licenses. Those are
> timed and things stop working when they expire. Purchased license are
> permanent and do not expire.
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 6:18 AM Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp <
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10/25/23 14:42, Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp wrote:
>>
>>> But we can reject licenses that expire in operation and cause an
>>> outage. That I think is a very reasonable ask.  I know that IOS XE for
>>> example will do this, you run out of license and your box breaks. I
>>> swapped out from CRS1k to ASR1k because I knew the organisation would
>>> eventually fail to fix the license ahead of expiry.
>> We had this happen to us in 2014 when we recovered a failed server
>> running CSR1000v. The "installation evaluation" license expired after 60
>> days, and since everyone forgot about it, the box went down.
>>
>> So as part of our deployment/recovery procedure, we always procure
>> CSR1000v licenses for each installation.
>>
>> Of course, with things changing to Cat8000v, this could get juicy.
>>
>>
>>> I'm happy if the device calls homes via https proxy, and reports my
>>> license use, and the sales droid tells me I'm not compliant with
>>> terms. Making it a commercial problem is fine, making it an acute
>>> technical problem is not.
>>>
>>>
>>> In your specific case, the ports never worked, you had to procure a
>>> license, and the license never dies. So from my POV, this is fine. And
>>> being absolutist here will not help, as then you can't even achieve
>>> reasonable compromise.
>> I tend to agree.
>>
>> Mark.
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzL92c-5uCwqrJhu0-QvKEMdS-Z2V2LBDoMIpEp3V-HsTI0CkWW3zc0jzZyDrfa2xzUObBrBBPokCA5uOFi2Mx3YQGF2pQRt$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzL92c-5uCwqrJhu0-QvKEMdS-Z2V2LBDoMIpEp3V-HsTI0CkWW3zc0jzZyDrfa2xzUObBrBBPokCA5uOFi2Mx3YQGF2pQRt$>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.