Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

Brandon Ross via juniper-nsp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.juniper
Message-ID <CAAK9-YkEZph5feAoWsN-uP1iQG1DECKyUfY0f0MTzUT5yx_nCg@mail.gmail.com>
Base licensing is useful if you self-spare, such that the capital invested
in cold spares sitting in a warehouse is significantly less than the full
cost of the device with licensing.

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 9:53 AM Michael Hare via juniper-nsp <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Richard-
>
> Sorry if this is off topic, but what's the use case for Base license on an
> MX?   Is it just to align the name of the licensing with EX and the ilk?
> Are there significant customers using hardware as whitebox?  We've been
> Juniper customer since the m40 days and always routed with them.  Thoughts
> and feelings aside about price and licensing management aside, I always
> found it curious that someone would purchase an MX and not need even static
> routing.  Our ASNs ended up in the "Advanced" bucket, which was essentially
> equivalent for us to the old "base".
>
> -Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: juniper-nsp <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
> > Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 7:51 AM
> > To: Saku Ytti <[email protected]>; Aaron Gould <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Karl Gerhard <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
> >
> > Aaron, what version of Junos are you using on your MX304? This should NOT
> > happen and if it did/is, then I suggest you open a Case with JTAC.
> Minimally
> > your account team should be able to get you a temp license to work-around
> > this until resolved.
> >
> > The introduction of newer (well now like 2 years old) Flex licensing all
> newly
> > purchased MX (which would include ALL MX304s) support only L2 in the base
> > (free) license. For any L3 (even static) you require some additional
> level of
> > license. For MX those levels are Base/Advanced/Premium -
> > https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/license/flex/flex-
> > license-for-mx-series-routers-and-mpc-service-cards.pdf. Your local
> Partner or
> > Juniper Sales team should be able to help with any questions in this
> area.
> >
> > Flex License can be purchased on a Subscription (yearly) basis or
> Perpetual
> > (matches older style) – this is similar/same for almost all vendors in
> current
> > times.
> >
> > Most (but not ALL!) Juniper license are currently “honor” based. This
> means
> > features that require a license will NOT be turned off if the license is
> not
> > present. Instead warning/error messages will be shown, which will
> [obviously]
> > fill up your logs quickly 😂 MACSec maybe one of those licenses which are
> > NOT “honor” based; there are others as well. Of course, Perpetual
> licenses
> > never expire 👍 Subscription licenses have a built-in ‘safety zone’ of
> > approximately 30 days after the subscription date expires. This is to
> provide
> > time for renewal of the subscription for those that “forget” 😩
> >
> > If you have an older subscription license which is no longer valid under
> newer
> > Flex license structure, at renewal the license will automatically be
> converted by
> > Juniper internal renewals team to the new Flex license SKU, at same
> price as
> > the older SKU, if there is a price [increase] difference.
> >
> > One big advantage of the new Flex license structure is that these
> licenses are
> > transferable. That is, these licenses are not permanently tied to a
> single device
> > SN. This also includes Perpetual Flex Licenses. In the Juniper Agile
> License Portal
> > (https://license.juniper.net/licensemanage/) where one turns a License
> SKU
> > [Entitlement] into a Activation [code] which then is used to create the
> actual
> > loadable license. Here one MUST associate the License with a SN, but that
> > License can then be re-called (changed from Activation back to
> Entitlement)
> > and then that Entitlement can be associated with a new SN. The license
> on the
> > old SN is no longer valid.
> >
> > As for current checks, Juniper is covered by EULA – End User License
> > Agreement. In the future Juniper can (and is likely to) add additional
> > enforcement checks into their SW – Just an FYI.
> >
> > FYI only, Rich
> >
> >
> > Richard McGovern
> > Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks
> > 978-618-3342
> >
> > I’d rather be lucky than good, as I know I am not good
> > I don’t make the news, I just report it
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Juniper Business Use Only
> >
> > On 10/25/23, 2:01 AM, "Saku Ytti" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 22:21, Aaron Gould via juniper-nsp
> > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > My MX304 trial license expired last night, after rebooting the MX304,
> > > various protocols no longer work.  This seems more than just
> > > honor-based... ospf, ldp, etc, no longer function.  This is new to me;
> > > that Juniper is making protocols and technologies tied to license.  I
> > > need to understand more about this, as I'm considering buying MX304's.
> >
> > Juniper had assured me multiple times that they strategically have
> > decided to NEVER do this. That it's an actual decision they've
> > considered at the highest level, that they will not downgrade devices
> > in operation. I guess 'reboot' is not in-operation?
> >
> > Notion that operators are able to keep licenses up-to-date and valid
> > is naive, we can't keep SSL certificates valid and we've had decades
> > of time to learn, it won't happen. You will learn about the problem,
> > when shit breaks.
> >
> > The right solution would be a phone-home, and a vendor sales rep
> > calling you 'hey you have expired licenses, let's solve this'. Not
> > breaking the boxes. Or 'your phone home hasn't worked, you need to fix
> > it before we can re-up your support contract'.
> > --
> >   ++ytti
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.