Re: [j-nsp] Hardware configuration for cRPD as RR

Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.juniper
Message-ID <CAAeewD8az7O19-1mKNdxepLnQ83kfbi2eGWaVqwgR=CR+1Cb+A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 16:22, Michael Hare via juniper-nsp
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I recognize Saku's recommendation of rib sharding is a practical one at 20M routes, I'm curious if anyone is willing to admit to using it in production and on what version of JunOS.  I admit to have not played with this in the lab yet, we are much smaller [3.5M RIB] worst case at this point.

2914 uses it, not out of desire (too new, too rare), but out of
necessity at scale 2914 needs. Surprisingly mature/robust for what it
is, and how rare routing suites are to support any type of
multithreading.

Of course the design is a relatively conservative and clever
compromise between building a truly multithreaded routing suite and
delivering something practical on a legacy codebase. It wouldn't help
in every RIB, but probably helps in every practical RIB. If you have a
low amount of duplicate RIB entries it might not be very useful, as
final collation of unique entries will be more or less single threaded
anyhow. But I believe anyone having a truly large RIB, like 20M, will
have massive duplication and will see significant benefit.

-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.