Re: [j-nsp] Hardware configuration for cRPD as RR
Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.juniper |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAeewD9aJkMdLJxtDqQ82+-U+wvcYEmWiLA1+Z+jtY312vy2+A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:42, Vincent Bernat via juniper-nsp <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2023-12-07 15:21, Michael Hare via juniper-nsp wrote: > > I recognize Saku's recommendation of rib sharding is a practical one at 20M routes, I'm curious if anyone is willing to admit to using it in production and on what version of JunOS. I admit to have not played with this in the lab yet, we are much smaller [3.5M RIB] worst case at this point. > > About the scale, I said routes, but they are paths. We plan to use add > path to ensure optimal routing (ORR could be another option, but it is > less common). Given a sufficient count of path options, they're not really alternatives, but you need both. Like you can't do add-path <max>, as the clients won't scale. And you probably don't want only ORR, because of the convergence cost of clients not having a backup option or the lack of ECMP opportunity. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp