Re: [j-nsp] Hardware configuration for cRPD as RR

Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.juniper
Message-ID <CAAeewD9aJkMdLJxtDqQ82+-U+wvcYEmWiLA1+Z+jtY312vy2+A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:42, Vincent Bernat via juniper-nsp
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2023-12-07 15:21, Michael Hare via juniper-nsp wrote:
> > I recognize Saku's recommendation of rib sharding is a practical one at 20M routes, I'm curious if anyone is willing to admit to using it in production and on what version of JunOS.  I admit to have not played with this in the lab yet, we are much smaller [3.5M RIB] worst case at this point.
>
> About the scale, I said routes, but they are paths. We plan to use add
> path to ensure optimal routing (ORR could be another option, but it is
> less common).

Given a sufficient count of path options, they're not really
alternatives, but you need both. Like you can't do add-path <max>, as
the clients won't scale. And you probably don't want only ORR, because
of the convergence cost of clients not having a backup option or the
lack of ECMP opportunity.

-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.