Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements
Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Feb 2024 09:03:56 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.juniper |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJH8Obyvk_wR0JuwyKePMAUf5GoQOh=_TgE974zeOFtp8Z6q+w@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks Mark for the quick reply. That was the validation I was looking for. The TAC tech was really unsure about what he was doing and I had to guide him through things, So this is very helpful. Thanks again. -Lee On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 8:54 AM Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2/6/24 18:48, Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I was having difficulty in getting an announcement of a IPv6 /32 block > > using prefix-lists rather than redistribution of the IP addresses in from > > other protocols. We only have a couple /64 blocks in use at the moment > but > > want to be able to announce the entire /32. In cisco, that would just be > a > > holddown route and then announce. Not sure how it works to Juniper. > > > > I configured a prefix-list that contained the /32 block in it. Then > created > > a policy statement with term 1 from prefix-list <list> and then term 2 > then > > accept. Set the export in BGP protocol peer of this policy statement and > it > > just ignores it. > > > > Now this same setup in IPv4 works fine. > > > > After a week of going round and round with Juniper TAC, they had me > setup a > > rib inet6 aggregate entry for the /32 and then use that in the policy > > statement. > > This is the equivalent of the "hold-down" route you refer to in > Cisco-land. Useful if the route does not exist in the RIB from any other > source. > > I'm guessing your IPv4 route just works without a hold-down route > because it is being learned from somewhere else (perhaps your IGP, iBGP > or a static route), and as such, already exists in the router's RIB for > your export policy to pick it up with no additional fiddling. > > Typically, BGP will not originate a route to its neighbors unless it > already exists in the routing table through some source. If it is an > aggregate route, a hold-down pointing to "discard" (Null0 in Cisco) is > enough. If it is a longer route assigned to a customer, that route > pointing to the customer will do. > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp